Start with the wallet your members need to use
A good wallet plan begins with a clear job for the product. We look at who will use it, what they need to do, and where they expect to do it. Those choices guide custody, platform and integration decisions before design work gets too far.
| Wallet choice | What to decide first | Useful design focus |
|---|---|---|
| Non-custodial | How people create, protect and restore access | Signing prompts, backup guidance and transaction details |
| Custodial | How the service manages accounts and permissions | Account protection, support steps and operational controls |
| Browser extension | Which desktop tasks matter most | Installation, connection and clear signing moments |
| Telegram Mini App | Which wallet actions belong inside Telegram | A simple path between the app and each wallet action |
| Mobile wallet | Which journeys need a dedicated phone experience | Onboarding, account access and readable transaction status |
You don’t need every format in the first release. Pick the main member journey, then note which networks, assets and actions it needs. If the wallet is part of a broader product, see our Web3 development work for related scope.
A wallet supporting an existing dApp may need a focused connection and signing flow. A standalone product may also need onboarding, recovery guidance and support tools. We can build from an MVP toward production, or take on a defined part beside your own team.
Make the important choices before the screens multiply
Picture a small exchange partnerships team the evening before an AMA. They want to show a wallet experience, but still need to settle who controls access and which actions belong in the demo. We would map those decisions first, then agree on a simple journey the team can explain clearly.
That kind of early conversation keeps product language honest. A non-custodial wallet should explain what users control and how they can restore access. A custodial wallet should make the service’s responsibilities and support boundaries plain. If the model is still open, we’ll record the question rather than designing as if it were settled.
We review the custody diagram, critical user paths and expected failure states with your product owner. Then we keep decisions and open questions in a shared record. You can bring existing product notes, rough screens or working code; they don’t need to be polished. If the wallet relies on contract behavior, align those choices with smart contract development before setting the acceptance criteria.
Which wallet journeys should the first release support?
The first release should make a small set of important wallet journeys easy to follow. Start with the action members came to complete, then decide what they need to understand before and after it.
Map the action, not just the screen
For a send flow, agree how users identify the asset, destination and amount. Make the signing action and transaction status clear. For a swap, decide what information people review and what the interface shows if the transaction cannot proceed. For multi-chain support, list the networks and show how users can tell which network and asset they’re working with.
Choose a surface that fits the moment
A browser extension can suit a desktop-first product. A mobile app can support a dedicated phone journey; see mobile app development for that product work. A Telegram Mini App can place wallet actions within a Telegram experience. Each surface brings its own design, implementation and verification work. We help you pick the first surface around actual member tasks, not a feature list.
Imagine a member checks an asset on their phone, then opens a Telegram Mini App to continue. We would map where the experience changes and what information must remain clear. For Telegram delivery, see Telegram bot and mini app development.
We can use that map to clarify the handoff and keep the member’s next action understandable. It also gives your team a concrete path for deciding which surfaces belong in the first release.
Give each wallet decision a place in the build
A wallet project is easier to follow when the team settles product questions before implementation. We use a 3-part check-in rhythm: clarify the decisions, review the work as flows take shape, and confirm the agreed handover.
- Share the starting picture. Tell us who the wallet is for, the main member tasks, target platforms and required networks. Include current designs, code and integrations if you have them.
- Review custody and architecture. We map account responsibilities, recovery, permissions, transaction journeys and open decisions with your product owner.
- Agree what ready means. We set the included work, acceptance criteria, dependencies and review points together. This gives everyone the same picture of completion.
- Design and build the agreed flows. The team works through the chosen product surfaces and technical connections. We check priority journeys as they take shape.
- Verify and hand over. We review the agreed work against acceptance criteria, prepare the specified security materials and document operational ownership.
The schedule comes after the team understands the chosen surfaces, custody approach, integrations and review needs. A first week can focus on gathering product details and resolving open questions, if that fits your team’s availability. We’ll keep the plan visible and identify where your team needs to provide access, approvals or technical contacts.
Keep wallet readiness grounded in what your team can check
A useful wallet handover gives your team more than working screens. Depending on the agreed work, it can include product requirements, interface designs, wallet code, backend or chain connections, and tests for priority flows. It can also include technical notes and a monitoring plan. If your wallet connects to a token launch, coordinate with token creation and deployment. For the broader product, Web3 development can help identify shared technical decisions.
Before release, bring the main checks into one place. Confirm that the custody and recovery choices are documented. Make sure users can review transaction details before signing. Assign owners for integrations, access and alerts. Give security review findings a clear owner and a path to resolution.
We can deliver the agreed implementation and prepare materials for security review. An external auditor decides its findings; your counsel must review the regulatory classification of any custodial product before launch. Network availability and third-party integration behavior also remain outside the build team’s control.
Send us a short brief with your users, custody choice if known, platforms, networks and priority actions. We’ll review it with your product owner and map the first wallet decisions together.
How it works
- Share the starting pictureTell us who the wallet is for, the main member tasks, target platforms and required networks. Include current designs, code or integrations if available.
- Review custody and architectureWe map account responsibilities, recovery, permissions, transaction journeys and open decisions with your product owner.
- Agree what ready meansWe set the included work, acceptance criteria, dependencies and review points together.
- Design and build the agreed flowsThe team works through the chosen product surfaces and technical connections, checking priority journeys as they take shape.
- Verify and hand overWe review the agreed work against acceptance criteria, prepare specified security materials and document operational ownership.
Frequently asked questions
What should I send before we discuss a wallet build?
Start with the intended users, the actions they need to take, target platforms and required networks. Tell us whether custody is settled and what services or contracts the wallet should connect to. Existing designs or code help, but rough notes are enough for a first discussion. We can list open decisions before anyone starts building.
Can you build a wallet where users control their own keys?
Yes. We can plan non-custodial wallets, custodial wallets or products with separate user and service responsibilities. For a non-custodial product, we’ll clarify how people create access, review signing requests and restore their wallet. Those choices affect both the product language and the technical plan.
Can one wallet support a browser extension and Telegram Mini App?
It can be planned for both, but each surface needs its own interaction design and verification. We first map the tasks members should complete on each surface. Then we agree how the experiences connect and which one belongs in the first release. That keeps the initial plan focused on real use.
How do you plan swaps and multiple networks?
We begin by listing the networks and actions the product needs to support. For a swap, we define what users review before confirming and what the interface shows if the action cannot proceed. For multiple networks, we make the active network and asset context clear in the user journey before implementation.
What needs to be decided before you set a wallet timeline?
We can set a useful schedule after reviewing custody, platforms, member journeys, integrations and security review needs. A focused wallet flow differs from a product with several surfaces and backend connections. We agree on the work, dependencies and review points together before implementation begins.
Does your security preparation mean an auditor will approve the wallet?
No. We can build the agreed product, test specified journeys and prepare materials for review, but the external auditor decides what findings to report. For example, a team can prepare an inventory of networks, integrations and privileged actions for reviewers. Your counsel should also assess the regulatory classification of a custodial product before launch.
Tell us about your project
Answer four quick questions and a manager will send you a plan, timing and a price range within the hour. Everything stays confidential.
Loading the form…